...
- Joel posted a psuedo wireframe on confluence, needs to be reviewed during this meeting
- Discussion on who should generate the wireframe (product owner vs developer)
- Will be iterative, revised as the project goes
- Reviewed current TSSG.Tech website with Lora's changes
- Need to make sure the conventions used on the website are simple, otherwise we are going to lose the visitor's interest
- May change "Testimonials" to Tributes or Recommendations or Success Stories
- Need to fix what happens when you click the button for the page you are currently on
- Icon on button of the page are VERY small on a phone screen. This is a sizing issue on the icon images.
- Review of the Design Guidelines page:
- Concern: "QA Study Group" sounds too limiting, they also contribute to the projects as needed
- Why was Software dropped from the group's name? We don't talk about physical machine hardware QA
- Suggested name is "SQA Group", need to talk about this within the QA group on Thursday
- Change Scrum to Daily StandupStand-up
- Do not like just single letters, too cryptic. Try to do short words instead (Web, Mobile, QA, Big Data, Home)
- Can this be a menu at the top of the page instead?
- Color coding could be problem for people with color blindness
- Should testimonials be put in now or be part of a later iteration?
- Look at the bottom of IBM.com, how it has jump off links in the footer for the different sections that the user can go to
- Also look at Boston-Spin.org for how the header and footer areas are done
- Thinks the centered text is too clunky, need to be very short phrases
- Suggestion to not have testimonials on our site, have a link that goes to reviews on a 3rd party site